Darren Cann: Arsenal should have had penalty for Havertz foul vs Hull
Former Premier League assistant referee Darren Cann says Arsenal should have been awarded a penalty for a foul on Kai Havertz in their 1-0 win over Hull City.
Former Premier League assistant referee Darren Cann has said Arsenal should have been awarded a penalty for a foul on Kai Havertz during their 1-0 victory over Hull City. Cann, now a television pundit, argued that the incident warranted a spot-kick. The match report confirmed Arsenal beat Hull to extend their lead at the top of the table.
In the match, the only goal came as Arsenal secured the win, but the main talking point was the challenge on Havertz. Cann, who officiated in the Premier League, explained his reasoning, saying the foul should have resulted in a penalty. The article did not specify the minute of the incident or the nature of the contact.
The win strengthens Arsenal's position at the top of the Premier League. The report noted that the result extended their lead, although the exact margin was not given. Hull City, meanwhile, were left to rue the defeat as they continue their campaign.
Cann's comments add to the debate over refereeing decisions. Some supporters took to social media to express frustration, with many arguing that the call could have changed the game. Others, however, felt the referee's decision was correct, highlighting the fine margins in top-flight football. These are fan opinions, not verified facts.
The incident is likely to be discussed further, but there was no indication from the article that Arsenal have made an official complaint. The focus now shifts to the next round of fixtures, with Arsenal aiming to maintain their lead and Hull seeking to bounce back.
